What Winnower Users Say
-
“The Winnower is an essential tool for open research. It has elevated open notebook science to unprecedented levels. The Winnower is a game changer in academic publication.”
-
“The Winnower is paving the path to the future of science communication in the most radical, exciting way. Scientists can finally put a name and a story to the research they publish; this is the definition of "open and transparent."”
-
“Scientific Publishing + Reddit = TheWinnower.com and Hopefully a More Open World of Science!!”
-
“The future of medical knowledge is open publication, open peer review, open access; knowledge from all and for all. The Winnower is a pioneer and the leader on this paradigm change.”
-
“Publishing in The Winnower allows me to quickly publish traditional and non-traditional publications to reach audience rapidly and openly”
-
“I have visited The Winnower web site and I very much like your idea of the new direction of scientific publications”
-
“I may be wrong but it feels like we will look back at the current period as a major change in the way we interact. It only took us two decades. Now, however, The Winnower is contributing disproportionately to our future. Thank you.”
-
“Although I did not ever think I would aspire to have my work highlighted in a section referred to as "The Chaff", I find the idea of your new journal interesting and likely informative for the scientific community”
-
“Re-imagine scientific publishing, unhindered by external pressures, with the sole focus to communicate science. Don't be surprised if you end up exactly at what The Winnower is doing.”
-
“The Winnower is one of the first publications that rightfully recognizes the educational value of both transparent peer reviews and open access scientific material. It is a modern scientific publication in the truest sense of the word”
-
“The Winnower is an excellent forum for sharing ideas and rapidly disseminating work that might not otherwise have a great forum. I think it's an excellent tool to engage a community with a very easy to use interface that generates great discussion between authors and reviewers. In total, it was the most supportive peer review process thus far, and allowed me to engage in great scholarly discussion with my reviewers in an open and transparent way.”