4.2 Modeled treatment stocks
When treatment stocks were estimated with a degraded model fitted to
each site, the four sites of Staley Creek, South Fork McKenzie River,
Whychus Creek, and Kimball Creek showed higher measured than predicted
treatment stocks at the 95% confidence level (Figure 2). Three sites
had lower than predicted stocks, and two did not show significant
differences. The estimated differences between measured and predicted
treatment stocks for sites where measured stocks exceeded predicted
stocks are 354 Mg/ha, 132 Mg/ha, 56 Mg/ha, and 118 Mg/ha for Staley
Creek, South Fork McKenzie River, Whychus Creek, and Kimball Creek,
respectively (Figure 2).