Site | Valuea | Degraded Stocks (Mg/ha) | Degraded Stocks (Mg/ha) | Degraded Stocks (Mg/ha) | Treatment Stocks (Mg/ha) | Treatment Stocks (Mg/ha) | Treatment Stocks (Mg/ha) | Reference Stocks (Mg/ha) | Reference Stocks (Mg/ha) |
Reach 1 | Reach 2 | Reach 3 | Reach 1 | Reach 2 | Reach 3 | Reach 1 | Reach 2 | ||
Fivemile Bell | Mean C stocks | 397 ± 115 | 293 ± 127 | 247 ± 47 | 283 ± 48 | 228 ± 63 | 593 ± 166 | ||
Oregon Coast Range | No. samples | 12 | 11 | 31 | 17 | 24 | 25 | ||
Combined mean | 347 ± 81 | 347 ± 81 | 347 ± 81 | 249 ± 30 | 249 ± 30 | 249 ± 30 | 593 ± 166* | 593 ± 166* | |
South Fork McKenzie River Willamette National Forest, Oregon |
Mean C stocks
|
177 ± 71
|
364 ± 73
|
348 ± 130
|
|||||
No. samples | 11 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | |
Combined mean | 177 ± 71 | 177 ± 71 | 177 ± 71 | 364 ± 73 | 364 ± 73 | 364 ± 73 | 348 ± 130 | 348 ± 130 | |
Staley Creek Willamette National Forest, Oregon |
Mean C stocks
|
279 ± 132
|
338 ± 119
|
659 ± 273
|
396 ± 146
|
||||
No. samples | 11 | 15 | 21 | 15 | |||||
Combined mean | 313 ± 83 | 313 ± 83 | 313 ± 83 | 659 ± 273 | 659 ± 273 | 659 ± 273 | 396 ± 146 | 396 ± 146 | |
Whychus Creek near Sisters, Oregon |
Mean C stocks
|
154 ± 41
|
170 ± 81
|
176 ± 43
|
249 ± 99
|
811 ± 191
|
|||
No. samples | 12 | 10 | 24 | 14 | 22 | ||||
Combined mean | 161 ± 39 | 161 ± 39 | 161 ± 39 | 203 ± 44 | 203 ± 44 | 203 ± 44 | 811 ± 191* | 811 ± 191* | |
Lost Creekb near Ochoco National Forest, Oregon |
Mean C stocks
|
355 ± 116
|
380 ± 51
|
391 ± 96
|
|||||
No. samples | 10 | 19 | 21 | ||||||
Combined mean | 355 ± 116 | 355 ± 116 | 355 ± 116 | 380 ± 51 | 380 ± 51 | 380 ± 51 | 391 ± 96 | 391 ± 96 | |
Deep Creekb Ochoco National Forest, Oregon |
Mean C stocks
|
421 ± 143
|
452 ± 58
|
515 ± 141
|
391 ± 96
|
||||
No. samples | 16 | 22 | 28 | 21 | |||||
Combined mean | 439 ± 65 | 439 ± 65 | 439 ± 65 | 515 ± 141 | 515 ± 141 | 515 ± 141 | 391 ± 96 | 391 ± 96 | |
East Canyon Creekc near Park City, Utah |
Mean C stocks
|
538 ± 103
|
564 ± 66
|
551 ± 89
|
430 ± 75
|
488 ± 72
|
904 ± 127
|
||
No. samples | 16 | 20 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 10 | |||
Combined mean | 552 ± 46 | 552 ± 46 | 552 ± 46 | 458 ± 51 | 458 ± 51 | 458 ± 51 | 904 ± 127* | 904 ± 127* | |
Kimball Creekc | Mean C stocks | 894 ± 135 | 1028 ± 102 | 904 ± 127 | |||||
near Park City, Utah | No. samples | 11 | 22 | 10 | |||||
Combined mean | 894 ± 135 | 894 ± 135 | 894 ± 135 | 1028 ± 102 | 1028 ± 102 | 1028 ± 102 | 904 ± 127 | 904 ± 127 | |
Colorado Sites | Mean C stocks | 768 ± 116 | 763 ± 303 | 419 ± 58 | 313 ± 67 | 403 ± 92 | 645 ± 263 | ||
South Park, Coloradod | No. samples | 15 | 6 | 11 | 22 | 22 | 11 | ||
Combined mean | 647 ± 91* | 647 ± 91* | 647 ± 91* | 313 ± 67 | 313 ± 67 | 313 ± 67 | 484 ± 106 | 484 ± 106 | |
All sites combined | Combined mean | 447 ± 34 | 447 ± 34 | 447 ± 34 | 413 ± 38 | 413 ± 38 | 413 ± 38 | 538 ± 59 | 538 ± 59 |
a Error values are margin of error
for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |
a Error
values are margin of error for a 95% confidence interval
b Lost Creek and Deep Creek use the same reference reach data from Gray’s Creek. c East Canyon Creek and Kimball Creek use the same reference reach data from McLeod Creek. d Sites in Colorado were collected on different streams farther away from each other than typical datasets. Degraded Reach 1 is on the Middle Fork South Platte River, Degraded Reach 2 is on Sheep Creek, and Degraded Reach 3 is on South Fork South Platte River. Treatment Reach 1 is on Salt Creek, and Reference Reach 1 is on Rough and Tumbling Creek. *Three reference and one degraded floodplain are higher than the other two categories at the 95% confidence level. |